Sweden becomes the first country to ban CFC aerosol sprays

Story: 1973 C.E.  |  Last updated: January 1, 1973

On January 23, 1978 C.E., Sweden announced it would ban aerosol spray cans that used chlorofluorocarbons — CFCs — as their propellant. No country had ever done this before. The decision was quiet, technical, and bureaucratic. It also helped save life on Earth.

What the evidence shows

• CFC aerosol ban: Sweden’s 1978 C.E. announcement made it the first country in the world to prohibit CFC-propelled aerosol sprays, acting on mounting scientific evidence before the Antarctic ozone hole was even discovered.
• Ozone layer protection: Scientists had established by the mid-1970s C.E. that CFCs rising into the stratosphere were breaking down ozone molecules — the thin atmospheric shield that blocks harmful ultraviolet radiation from reaching Earth’s surface.
• Montreal Protocol: Sweden’s early action helped establish a political template. Virtually every nation on Earth eventually followed, signing the landmark international treaty that entered into force on January 1, 1989 C.E.

Why CFCs were a problem

Chlorofluorocarbons were everywhere by the 1970s C.E. They chilled refrigerators, pressurized hairspray cans, and kept air conditioners running. They were cheap, stable, and seemed harmless. That apparent harmlessness was precisely the problem.

Because CFCs don’t break down easily in the lower atmosphere, they drift upward into the stratosphere — the layer of the atmosphere roughly 15 to 35 kilometers above Earth’s surface. There, ultraviolet radiation splits them apart, releasing chlorine atoms that catalytically destroy ozone molecules in large numbers. A single chlorine atom can destroy more than 100,000 ozone molecules before it is deactivated.

The ozone layer absorbs the majority of the sun’s harmful UV-B radiation. Without it, rates of skin cancer, cataracts, and damage to marine ecosystems would rise sharply. Scientists Mario Molina and F. Sherwood Rowland published their landmark findings in 1974 C.E., warning that CFC emissions could deplete the ozone layer over time. They would share the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for this work in 1995 C.E.

Sweden acts before the hole appears

What makes Sweden’s 1978 C.E. decision remarkable is its timing. The announcement came seven years before the British Antarctic Survey’s 1985 C.E. discovery of a dramatic hole in the ozone layer over Antarctica — a finding that shocked the scientific world and galvanized global action.

Sweden moved on the theoretical evidence alone. This was not inevitable. The science was contested in some quarters, and the chemical industry had economic reasons to resist it. Sweden’s political culture — shaped by decades of strong environmental legislation and a public that took ecological risks seriously — helped translate scientific concern into policy before catastrophe made the choice obvious.

The United States followed with its own CFC aerosol ban later in 1978 C.E. Canada and Norway acted in the same period. But Sweden was first.

The Montreal Protocol and what followed

When British and American researchers confirmed the Antarctic ozone hole in 1985 C.E., global momentum shifted rapidly. Negotiations accelerated. In 1987 C.E., the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer was agreed upon, and it entered into force on January 1, 1989 C.E.

The treaty has since been revised eight times and is now ratified by every member state of the United Nations — one of the only truly universal environmental treaties in history. It phased out not just CFC aerosols but also halons, carbon tetrachloride, and other ozone-depleting chemicals used in refrigeration, foam manufacturing, and fire suppression.

The transition turned out to be smoother than many feared. Most consumers never noticed a difference when manufacturers switched to propane, butane, or mechanical pump dispensers. The industries most affected found viable alternatives faster than expected.

Lasting impact

The ozone story is one of the clearest examples in history of the international scientific community identifying a threat, governments acting on that evidence, and the Earth responding — slowly but measurably.

Since the mid-1990s C.E., the area and depth of the Antarctic ozone hole at its annual maximum have roughly stabilized. Concentrations of CFCs and bromine-containing halons over Antarctica had already declined about 9 percent below their 2000 C.E. peak by 2014 C.E. Scientists now project that ozone levels will return to 1980 C.E. baselines between 2050 and 2070 C.E.

Three scientists — Anne R. Douglass, Paul A. Newman, and Susan Solomon — writing in Physics Today in July 2014 C.E., put it plainly: “Its disappearance will symbolize the possibility of protecting Earth through cooperative actions.”

The ozone story also served as a model — imperfect and contested, but real — for later climate diplomacy. It demonstrated that nations could agree on a shared threat, coordinate regulation across economic interests, and sustain that commitment across decades.

Blindspots and limits

The recovery of the ozone layer has been slow, and the hole has not yet begun to shrink in any definitive way despite decades of CFC reductions. Scientists are also grappling with the role that warming global temperatures play in ozone depletion and recovery — a complicating variable the original Montreal Protocol framework did not anticipate.

The story also has gaps. Developing nations were given extended timelines to phase out ozone-depleting substances, and enforcement has been uneven. Illegal CFC production was detected as recently as 2018 C.E., pointing to ongoing monitoring challenges that no treaty alone can fully solve.

Read more

For more on this story, see: EarthSky — Sweden goes first to ban aerosol sprays

For more from Good News for Humankind, see:

• Renewables now make up at least 49% of global power capacity
• Ghana establishes a marine protected area at Cape Three Points
• The Good News for Humankind archive on the modern era

About this article

• 🤖 This article is AI-generated, based on a framework created by Peter Schulte.
• 🌍 It aims to be inspirational but clear-eyed, accurate, and evidence-based, and grounded in care for the Earth, peace and belonging for all, and human evolution.
• 💬 Leave your notes and suggestions in the comments below — I will do my best to review and implement where appropriate.
• ✉️ One verified piece of good news, one insight from Antihero Project, every weekday morning. Subscribe free.