Prison cell, for article on federal private prisons

U.S. Justice Department announces plan to end federal private prisons

In the summer of 2016 C.E., the U.S. Justice Department issued a directive that reversed 35 years of expanding reliance on private prisons. Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates sent a memo to Bureau of Prisons officials instructing them to phase out contracts with private operators — letting them expire or dramatically shrinking their scope — with the stated goal of ending the federal government’s use of privately operated prisons entirely.

Key findings

  • Private prison safety: A Justice Department Inspector General report found that privately operated federal facilities had higher rates of inmate-on-inmate and inmate-on-staff assaults, and confiscated eight times as many contraband cellphones annually as government-run facilities.
  • Federal prison contracts: The phase-out applied to 13 privately run facilities housing roughly 22,100 federal inmates — about 12 percent of the total Bureau of Prisons population — with all contracts set to come up for renewal within five years.
  • Bureau of Prisons reform: Three weeks before the memo, the bureau had already declined to renew a 1,200-bed contract in New Mexico, and Yates directed officials to reduce a pending 10,800-bed solicitation to a maximum of 3,600 beds.

What the evidence showed

The Inspector General’s report, released just days before Yates’ memo, was damning in specific terms. Private facilities recorded more assaults, more contraband, and more serious incidents than comparable government-run prisons. One example: a May 2012 riot at the Adams County Correctional Center in Mississippi, where 250 inmates upset about food and medical care injured 20 people and killed a correctional officer.

Yates was direct about the conclusion. “They simply do not provide the same level of correctional services, programs, and resources; they do not save substantially on costs; and they do not maintain the same level of safety and security,” she wrote.

The announcement sent private prison stocks into a sharp decline. Corrections Corporation of America and GEO Group, the two largest operators, disputed the Inspector General’s findings and said independent studies showed their facilities were comparable or superior to government-run ones. Their pushback signaled that the phase-out would face real-world friction, not just bureaucratic inertia.

Why it was seen as historic

Private prisons had expanded almost continuously since the early 1980s C.E., when the Reagan administration began exploring market-based solutions to prison overcrowding. By 2016 C.E., the industry had become deeply embedded in the federal and state carceral systems, with contracts worth billions of dollars and a well-funded lobbying presence in Washington.

David Fathi, director of the ACLU National Prison Project, called it “a startling and major reversal” of a 35-year trend. Criminal justice reform advocates had long argued that the profit motive in private prisons created incentives misaligned with rehabilitation — companies earned more when facilities stayed full, which critics said created pressure against reducing incarceration rates.

The directive also came in a broader moment of reckoning with mass incarceration in the United States. Investigative journalism had helped shift public awareness. Mother Jones published a 35,000-word undercover account of life inside a private prison in Louisiana just weeks before the memo. The Nation had reported on deaths under questionable circumstances in privately operated facilities. The Inspector General’s report landed in a political climate that was, at least briefly, receptive to reform.

Lasting impact

The Yates memo was a genuine inflection point — and also an illustration of how quickly policy can reverse. The Trump administration rescinded the directive in February 2017 C.E., just six months later, instructing the Bureau of Prisons to keep using private facilities. The Brennan Center for Justice has documented how private prison use subsequently rebounded, particularly in immigration detention.

Still, the 2016 C.E. directive mattered. It established a formal federal record that private prisons underperform government-run facilities on safety and cost — a finding that advocates have cited in subsequent legislative fights at the state level. Several states, including California, passed laws restricting or banning private prisons in the years that followed. The Biden administration in 2021 C.E. reinstated the policy through an executive order directing the Justice Department to phase out private prison contracts once again.

The question of what replaces private prisons — and whether government-run facilities are meaningfully better for the people inside them — remains contested. Prison Policy Initiative data shows the U.S. still incarcerates more people per capita than any other country, private or public.

Blindspots and limits

The Yates memo never applied to the majority of incarcerated people in America. State prisons, which house the vast majority of U.S. inmates, were untouched. So were ICE detention centers and U.S. Marshals facilities — sectors where private operators hold a much higher share of the population and conditions have drawn sustained criticism from human rights organizations. The 2016 C.E. directive was a significant step inside a narrow jurisdiction, not a systemic transformation of American incarceration.

Read more

For more on this story, see: The Washington Post

For more from Good News for Humankind, see:

About this article

  • 🤖 This article is AI-generated, based on a framework created by Peter Schulte.
  • 🌍 It aims to be inspirational but clear-eyed, accurate, and evidence-based, and grounded in care for the Earth, peace and belonging for all, and human evolution.
  • 💬 Leave your notes and suggestions in the comments below — I will do my best to review and implement where appropriate.
  • ✉️ One verified piece of good news, one insight from Antihero Project, every weekday morning. Subscribe free.

More Good News

  • Rows of solar panels in a Chinese desert reflecting China wind and solar capacity growth under the Five-Year Plan clean energy targets

    China plans to double its already massive clean energy supply by 2035

    China’s new climate pledge to the United Nations sets a target of 3,600 gigawatts of wind and solar power by 2035 — more than the entire electricity-generating capacity of the United States today, and roughly double what China has already built. The commitment is woven into the country’s next Five-Year Plan, which directs state banks, provinces, and manufacturers to move in the same direction. Because China makes about 80% of the world’s solar panels, every factory it scales up makes clean energy cheaper for buyers in Africa, Southeast Asia, Latin America, and everywhere else. That ripple effect is what makes…


  • Medical researcher in a lab examining vials related to asthma and COPD treatment and mRNA vaccine development, for article on benralizumab injection

    Doctors hail first breakthrough in asthma and COPD treatment in 50 years

    Benralizumab, a single injection given during an asthma or COPD attack, outperformed the steroid pills that have been the only emergency option since the 1970s. In a King’s College London trial of 158 patients, those who got the shot had four times fewer treatment failures over 90 days, along with easier breathing and fewer follow-up visits. Because steroids carry real risks with repeated use — diabetes, osteoporosis, and more — a genuine alternative could change daily life for millions of people who live in fear of the next flare-up. After a half-century of stalled progress on diseases that claim 3.8…


  • A nurse in a rural Mexican clinic checks a patient's blood pressure, for an article about Mexico universal healthcare

    Mexico launches universal healthcare for all 133 million citizens

    Mexico universal healthcare is now officially a reality, with the country launching a system designed to cover all 133 million citizens through the restructured IMSS-Bienestar network. Before this reform, an estimated 50 million Mexicans had no formal health insurance, with rural and Indigenous communities bearing the heaviest burden of untreated illness and medical debt. The new system severs the long-standing tie between employment and healthcare access, providing free consultations, medicines, and hospital services regardless of income. If implemented effectively, Mexico’s move could serve as a powerful model for other middle-income nations still navigating fragmented, inequitable health systems.



Coach, writer, and recovering hustle hero. I help purpose-driven humans do good in the world in dark times - without the burnout.