In the summer of 2016 C.E., the U.S. Justice Department issued a directive that reversed 35 years of expanding reliance on private prisons. Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates sent a memo to Bureau of Prisons officials instructing them to phase out contracts with private operators — letting them expire or dramatically shrinking their scope — with the stated goal of ending the federal government’s use of privately operated prisons entirely.
Key findings
- Private prison safety: A Justice Department Inspector General report found that privately operated federal facilities had higher rates of inmate-on-inmate and inmate-on-staff assaults, and confiscated eight times as many contraband cellphones annually as government-run facilities.
- Federal prison contracts: The phase-out applied to 13 privately run facilities housing roughly 22,100 federal inmates — about 12 percent of the total Bureau of Prisons population — with all contracts set to come up for renewal within five years.
- Bureau of Prisons reform: Three weeks before the memo, the bureau had already declined to renew a 1,200-bed contract in New Mexico, and Yates directed officials to reduce a pending 10,800-bed solicitation to a maximum of 3,600 beds.
What the evidence showed
The Inspector General’s report, released just days before Yates’ memo, was damning in specific terms. Private facilities recorded more assaults, more contraband, and more serious incidents than comparable government-run prisons. One example: a May 2012 riot at the Adams County Correctional Center in Mississippi, where 250 inmates upset about food and medical care injured 20 people and killed a correctional officer.
Yates was direct about the conclusion. “They simply do not provide the same level of correctional services, programs, and resources; they do not save substantially on costs; and they do not maintain the same level of safety and security,” she wrote.
The announcement sent private prison stocks into a sharp decline. Corrections Corporation of America and GEO Group, the two largest operators, disputed the Inspector General’s findings and said independent studies showed their facilities were comparable or superior to government-run ones. Their pushback signaled that the phase-out would face real-world friction, not just bureaucratic inertia.
Why it was seen as historic
Private prisons had expanded almost continuously since the early 1980s C.E., when the Reagan administration began exploring market-based solutions to prison overcrowding. By 2016 C.E., the industry had become deeply embedded in the federal and state carceral systems, with contracts worth billions of dollars and a well-funded lobbying presence in Washington.
David Fathi, director of the ACLU National Prison Project, called it “a startling and major reversal” of a 35-year trend. Criminal justice reform advocates had long argued that the profit motive in private prisons created incentives misaligned with rehabilitation — companies earned more when facilities stayed full, which critics said created pressure against reducing incarceration rates.
The directive also came in a broader moment of reckoning with mass incarceration in the United States. Investigative journalism had helped shift public awareness. Mother Jones published a 35,000-word undercover account of life inside a private prison in Louisiana just weeks before the memo. The Nation had reported on deaths under questionable circumstances in privately operated facilities. The Inspector General’s report landed in a political climate that was, at least briefly, receptive to reform.
Lasting impact
The Yates memo was a genuine inflection point — and also an illustration of how quickly policy can reverse. The Trump administration rescinded the directive in February 2017 C.E., just six months later, instructing the Bureau of Prisons to keep using private facilities. The Brennan Center for Justice has documented how private prison use subsequently rebounded, particularly in immigration detention.
Still, the 2016 C.E. directive mattered. It established a formal federal record that private prisons underperform government-run facilities on safety and cost — a finding that advocates have cited in subsequent legislative fights at the state level. Several states, including California, passed laws restricting or banning private prisons in the years that followed. The Biden administration in 2021 C.E. reinstated the policy through an executive order directing the Justice Department to phase out private prison contracts once again.
The question of what replaces private prisons — and whether government-run facilities are meaningfully better for the people inside them — remains contested. Prison Policy Initiative data shows the U.S. still incarcerates more people per capita than any other country, private or public.
Blindspots and limits
The Yates memo never applied to the majority of incarcerated people in America. State prisons, which house the vast majority of U.S. inmates, were untouched. So were ICE detention centers and U.S. Marshals facilities — sectors where private operators hold a much higher share of the population and conditions have drawn sustained criticism from human rights organizations. The 2016 C.E. directive was a significant step inside a narrow jurisdiction, not a systemic transformation of American incarceration.
Read more
For more on this story, see: The Washington Post
For more from Good News for Humankind, see:
- Global suicide rate has fallen by 40% since 1995
- Indigenous land rights recognition reaches 160 million hectares
- The Good News for Humankind archive on criminal justice
About this article
- 🤖 This article is AI-generated, based on a framework created by Peter Schulte.
- 🌍 It aims to be inspirational but clear-eyed, accurate, and evidence-based, and grounded in care for the Earth, peace and belonging for all, and human evolution.
- 💬 Leave your notes and suggestions in the comments below — I will do my best to review and implement where appropriate.
- ✉️ One verified piece of good news, one insight from Antihero Project, every weekday morning. Subscribe free.
More Good News
-

Renewables hit 49% of global power capacity for the first time
Renewable energy capacity crossed a landmark threshold in 2025, with global installed power surpassing 5,100 gigawatts and representing 49% of all capacity worldwide for the first time in history. The International Renewable Energy Agency reported a single-year addition of 692 gigawatts, led overwhelmingly by solar power, which alone accounted for 75% of new renewable installations. Clean energy now represents 85.6% of all new power capacity added globally, signaling that the transition has moved from aspiration to economic reality. The milestone carries implications beyond climate — nations with strong renewable bases demonstrated measurably greater energy security amid ongoing geopolitical instability.
-

Global suicide rate has dropped nearly 40% since the 1990s
Global suicide rates have dropped nearly 40% since the early 1990s, falling from roughly 15 deaths per 100,000 people to around nine — one of modern public health’s most significant and underreported victories. This decline was driven by expanded mental health services, crisis intervention programs, and proven strategies like restricting access to lethal means. The progress spans dozens of countries, with especially sharp declines in East Asia and Europe. Critically, this trend demonstrates that suicide is preventable at a population level — making the case for sustained investment in mental health infrastructure worldwide.
-

Rhinos return to Uganda’s wild after 43 years of absence
Uganda rhino reintroduction marks a historic milestone: wild rhinoceroses are roaming Ugandan soil for the first time in over 40 years. In 2026, rhinos bred at Ziwa Rhino Sanctuary were released into Kidepo Valley National Park, ending an absence caused entirely by poaching and political collapse during the Idi Amin era. The release represents decades of careful breeding, conservation funding, and community engagement. For local communities, conservationists, and a watching world, it proves that deliberate, sustained human effort can reverse even the most painful wildlife losses.

