Homer’s oral epics, The Iliad and The Odyssey, reshape the ancient world

Story: 730 B.C.E.  |  Last updated: January 13, 0001

Around 730 B.C.E., a poet — or perhaps a tradition of poets — gave the ancient Greek world something it had never had before: two vast, intricate stories of war and homecoming so powerful that they would still be read, translated, and debated nearly three thousand years later. Whether we call this person Homer or simply acknowledge the moment when these epics crystallized into the forms we know, the achievement stands as one of the most enduring in human history.

What the evidence shows

• Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey: The two poems together run to nearly 28,000 lines of hexameter verse — The Iliad with 15,693 lines covering 51 days in the final year of the Trojan War, and The Odyssey with 12,109 lines tracing the hero Odysseus’s long journey home.
• Oral composition: Both epics were not written down at the time of their composition. They were created and transmitted orally by performers called rhapsodes, in an archaic form of Ionian Greek — only later compiled and edited, first under the Athenian statesman Peisistratus, and then by Alexandrian scholars including Aristarchus of Samothrace.
• Homeric authorship: Even in antiquity, scholars debated whether one person composed both poems. The so-called “Homeric Question” — whether these works came from a single genius, a tradition of singers, or layered editorial tradition — remains genuinely open. The greatness of the poems is not diminished either way.

A world of gods and heroes

The Iliad opens with a word: wrath. “Sing, Muse, of the wrath of Achilles” — and from that first line, the poem pulls readers into a world where divine anger and human pride destroy thousands of lives. The poem takes its name from Ilium, another name for Troy, and follows the consequences of Achilles’ rage against Agamemnon across 24 books.

The scenes that have stayed with readers across millennia are not only the battles. The reconciliation between Achilles and the grieving Trojan king Priam — enemies sharing bread over Priam’s dead son — is among the most quietly devastating moments in all of world literature. The poet who composed it understood something profound about grief, dignity, and the humanity of an enemy.

The Odyssey shifts the frame entirely. War is over. The hero Odysseus needs only to go home. But the gods, especially Poseidon, have other plans. The poem becomes a catalog of dangers — the Cyclops Polyphemus, the Sirens, the witch Circe — and a meditation on longing, loyalty, and the meaning of home. It introduces one of literature’s first fully realized female characters in Penelope, whose intelligence and steadfastness holds a kingdom together for a decade.

The oral tradition behind the text

One of the most important things to understand about these poems is that they were not written in the modern sense. They emerged from a long tradition of oral performance, in which trained singers would draw on formulaic phrases, stock epithets (“rosy-fingered Dawn,” “swift-footed Achilles”), and episode clusters to compose and recompose the stories in front of live audiences. This is why the texts have a musical quality that rewards being read aloud, and why certain inconsistencies in the narrative may simply reflect the nature of a tradition rather than a single author’s lapses.

The 20th-century scholar Milman Parry, working in the 1920s and 1930s C.E., transformed our understanding of this oral tradition by studying living epic singers in the Balkans and showing how oral composition works. His findings suggested that the Homeric poems were the culmination of a long oral tradition, not a singular act of literary creation — a finding that is now broadly accepted in classical scholarship, though debates continue about the transition to written text.

This understanding also connects the Greek epics to a much wider human tradition. Oral epic traditions existed across Mesopotamia, South Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and the pre-Columbian Americas. The Epic of Gilgamesh from ancient Mesopotamia predates Homer by more than a thousand years. Homer’s achievement was extraordinary — but it was also part of something universal: the human drive to make meaning through story.

Lasting impact

It is difficult to overstate how thoroughly Homer’s two epics shaped the culture that followed them. In ancient Greece, the poems functioned almost as scripture: children memorized them as part of their education, philosophers quoted them to make arguments, and artists depicted scenes from them on pottery, sculpture, and temple friezes. Alongside Hesiod’s Theogony, the Homeric epics were the primary source through which Greeks understood their gods and their own origins.

The influence did not stop at Greece’s borders. Virgil’s Aeneid, composed around 19 B.C.E., is explicitly modeled on both poems — its first half echoing The Odyssey, its second echoing The Iliad. Roman culture absorbed and transmitted the Homeric tradition. Medieval European literature encountered Homer largely through Latin intermediaries before the Greek texts returned to Western Europe via Byzantine scholars in the 14th and 15th centuries C.E.

The first printed edition of Homer appeared in 1488 C.E. in Florence, prepared by the scholar Demetrius Chalcondyles. From there, the poems entered the canon of European humanism and spread globally through colonialism, translation, and education — making them, for better and worse, among the most widely distributed texts in human history.

Today, The Iliad and The Odyssey are translated into hundreds of languages. New translations appear regularly, each generation finding fresh angles. Emily Wilson’s 2017 C.E. translation of The Odyssey — the first into English by a woman — opened debates about gender, slavery, and language that the poem’s long reception history had often papered over. Translation itself has become one of the richest sites of literary scholarship in the Homeric tradition.

Blindspots and limits

The Homeric tradition that survived was selected, edited, and canonized by a specific set of institutions — Athenian, then Alexandrian, then Roman, then Byzantine, then Western European. Many other Greek epic traditions were lost entirely; the poems we call Homer are partly the poems that powerful gatekeepers chose to preserve. The framing of Homer as the origin point of “Western literature” also carries a historical weight that has sometimes been used to exclude non-European traditions from serious literary study — a use the poems themselves did not invite, but which their reception history made possible. And the world these poems depict, for all its beauty, is one built on slavery, conquest, and the subordination of women: realities the text registers but does not question.

Read more

For more on this story, see: Ancient History Encyclopedia — Homer

For more from Good News for Humankind, see:

• Ghana establishes a new marine protected area at Cape Three Points
• Uganda reintroduces rhinos to Kidepo Valley
• The Good News for Humankind archive on antiquity

About this article

• 🤖 This article is AI-generated, based on a framework created by Peter Schulte.
• 🌍 It aims to be inspirational but clear-eyed, accurate, and evidence-based, and grounded in care for the Earth, peace and belonging for all, and human evolution.
• 💬 Leave your notes and suggestions in the comments below — I will do my best to review and implement where appropriate.
• ✉️ One verified piece of good news, one insight from Antihero Project, every weekday morning. Subscribe free.