Courts

This archive collects milestones involving courts — judicial bodies at local, national, and international levels — as actors in meaningful change. Stories here cover rulings, legal precedents, and decisions that advanced rights, accountability, or justice around the world.

The U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C., for an article about Alabama redistricting and the Voting Rights Act

Supreme Court upholds Black voters’ rights in Alabama redistricting case

Alabama redistricting and voting rights scored a landmark victory in 2023 when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to uphold Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, ordering Alabama to redraw congressional maps that illegally diluted Black voters’ political power. The decision surprised many observers who feared the conservative court would further weaken voting protections following its 2013 Shelby County ruling. Chief Justice John Roberts joined the liberal justices in affirming the legal standard protecting minority communities from racially discriminatory district maps. The ruling immediately pressured Louisiana, Georgia, and Texas to address similar redistricting violations.

Tiger profile, for article on wildlife crime ruling

Landmark Nepal court ruling ends impunity for wealthy wildlife collectors

Nepal’s Supreme Court has ordered the government to seize illegal wildlife collections held by wealthy citizens, ending decades of selective enforcement that punished poor and Indigenous communities while elite collectors displayed tiger pelts and rhino heads openly in their homes. The May 2023 ruling, sparked by a writ petition from conservationist Kumar Paudel, requires private collectors to register their holdings — anything acquired after 1973, when Nepal’s conservation law took effect, is subject to seizure. In a thoughtful twist, the court ordered confiscated items preserved for public education rather than incinerated, turning evidence of wildlife crime into tools for awareness. By insisting that conservation law reach the powerful as well as the poor, the ruling points toward a more just foundation for protecting wildlife everywhere.