A person repairing a smartphone circuit board for an article about right to repair laws

Right to repair laws have now been introduced in all 50 U.S. states

For the first time in U.S. history, right to repair legislation has been filed in every single state — and 2025 C.E. marked the movement’s most successful legislative year ever, with five states passing laws that require manufacturers to give consumers and independent shops real access to the parts, tools, and documentation needed to fix the electronics and equipment they already own.

At a glance

  • Right to repair laws: Five states — New York, California, Minnesota, Oregon, and Colorado — have now passed electronics right to repair legislation, meaning one in five Americans lives somewhere with legal repair protections.
  • All 50 states: With the introduction of a bill in Wisconsin, every U.S. state has now had right to repair legislation introduced — a sweep advocates have been working toward since the first electronics bill was filed in South Dakota in 2014 C.E.
  • Active legislation: Bills are currently active in 24 states, reflecting broad, bipartisan public demand for consumer ownership rights and repair competition.

What these laws actually do

For years, many manufacturers designed products to be serviced only through their own authorized networks — locking out independent shops and individual owners through proprietary parts, encrypted diagnostics, and withheld documentation. The new state laws break that model.

Under the legislation, manufacturers must make repair manuals and diagnostic software publicly available and sell replacement parts at fair prices. That applies to digital electronics in some states and extends to farm equipment in others. Colorado’s law is among the most expansive, covering agricultural machinery. New York was an early mover focused on consumer electronics.

For independent repair shops — many of them small, community-based businesses — this access changes what’s economically possible. They can now compete for work that manufacturers previously funneled to their own service centers. That means more local jobs, lower costs for consumers, and longer-lived products.

The environmental case for repair

The World Economic Forum estimates that e-waste is one of the fastest-growing waste streams on the planet. Most discarded electronics aren’t recycled effectively — they contain valuable metals and hazardous materials that end up in landfills or informal recycling operations, often in lower-income countries that had no role in producing that waste.

Right to repair laws attack the problem at the source. When a cracked screen or a failed battery no longer means replacing an entire device, the raw materials and manufacturing energy already embedded in that product go further. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has flagged electronics manufacturing as a significant source of carbon emissions and resource extraction — extending product life is one of the most direct ways to cut that footprint.

It’s a principle that connects repair rights to the broader push for sustainable consumption: the greenest product is often the one you already own.

Eleven years of grassroots organizing

This milestone didn’t come from top-down policy. It came from more than a decade of organizing by repair advocates, independent shop owners, farmers frustrated by locked-down tractor software, and consumer rights groups including U.S. PIRG and Repair.org. The coalition is deliberately broad — rural and urban, left and right — which explains why bills have found bipartisan support across multiple state legislatures.

“Here, there and everywhere — people just want to fix their stuff,” said Nathan Proctor, PIRG’s Senior Right to Repair Campaign Director. “Americans are fed up with all the ways in which manufacturers of everything from toasters to tractors frustrate or block repairs, and lawmakers are hearing that frustration and taking action.”

The Electronic Frontier Foundation has also played a key role, pushing back against the intellectual property arguments manufacturers use to justify repair restrictions. Their work helped reframe the debate: this isn’t about circumventing copyright — it’s about who owns a product after it’s sold.

Over time, manufacturers themselves have begun shifting. Google is now a major supporter of right to repair legislation in the U.S., and Apple has come on board to support some laws — a striking reversal from the early years when the industry’s default position was opposition.

What’s still unresolved

Five states passing laws is a landmark, but the patchwork of state-level legislation creates real complexity. Someone in a state without a law still faces the same locked-out repairs as before. Federal right to repair legislation has been introduced repeatedly and has stalled each time.

There’s also an open question about enforcement. Laws requiring parts availability are only as strong as the agencies monitoring compliance — and advocates are already watching whether manufacturers find ways to technically comply while practically limiting access. The Federal Trade Commission has documented these kinds of workarounds in detail.

Still, the trajectory is clear. With active legislation in 24 states and bills on the books everywhere else, the right to repair has moved from fringe cause to mainstream demand. The same kind of patient, consistent advocacy that has produced progress across other long-running public interest campaigns — from clean energy to public health — is what got the movement here. Advocates have every reason to keep pushing.

Read more

For more on this story, see: iFixit — Right to repair laws have now been introduced in all 50 U.S. states

For more from Good News for Humankind, see:

About this article

  • 🤖 This article is AI-generated, based on a framework created by Peter Schulte.
  • 🌍 It aims to be inspirational but clear-eyed, accurate, and evidence-based, and grounded in care for the Earth, peace and belonging for all, and human evolution.
  • 💬 Leave your notes and suggestions in the comments below — I will do my best to review and implement where appropriate.
  • ✉️ One verified piece of good news, one insight from Antihero Project, every weekday morning. Subscribe free.

More Good News

  • Ocelot resting on a rainforest branch for an article about indigenous land rights COP30

    COP30 pledges recognition of 160 million hectares of Indigenous land rights

    At the COP30 World Leaders Summit in Belém, Brazil in November 2025, 15 governments pledged to formally recognize Indigenous land rights over 160 million hectares by 2030 — an area the size of Iran — through the Intergovernmental Land Tenure Commitment. Brazil committed at least 59 million hectares. More than 35 donors renewed a $1.8 billion Forest and Land Tenure Pledge. The Tropical Forest Forever Facility secured nearly $7 billion, with 20% directed to Indigenous peoples. It was the largest Indigenous participation in COP history.


  • Fishing boats on a West African coastline at sunrise for an article about Ghana marine protected area

    Ghana declares its first marine protected area to rescue depleted fish stocks

    Ghana’s marine protected area — the country’s first ever — marks a historic turning point for a nation gripped by a quiet fisheries crisis. Established near Cape Three Points in the Western Region, the protected zone restricts or bans fishing activity to allow severely depleted fish populations to recover. Ghana’s coastal stocks have fallen by an estimated 80 percent from historic levels, threatening food security and the livelihoods of millions of small-scale fishers. The declaration also carries regional significance, potentially inspiring neighboring Gulf of Guinea nations to establish coordinated protections of their own.


  • Researcher examining brain scan imagery for an article about Alzheimer's prevention trial results

    U.S. researchers cut Alzheimer’s risk by half in first-ever prevention trial

    Alzheimer’s prevention may have reached a turning point after a landmark trial showed that removing amyloid plaques before symptoms appear can cut the risk of developing the disease by roughly 50%. Researchers at Washington University School of Medicine studied people with rare genetic mutations that make Alzheimer’s nearly inevitable, finding that early, aggressive treatment can genuinely alter the disease’s course. The results, published in The Lancet Neurology, mark the first time any intervention has shown potential to prevent Alzheimer’s from appearing at all, not merely slow its progression. That distinction matters enormously, since amyloid begins accumulating in the brain two…



Coach, writer, and recovering hustle hero. I help purpose-driven humans do good in the world in dark times - without the burnout.