The myth of bigger impact illustrated through arrows going up

The myth of bigger impact

You want to have a bigger impact in the world, right? It sounds noble. Many of us long to contribute more; to do real good in the world; to foster generative, sustainable systems, especially in such dark times.

But here’s the problem: when we chase bigger impact, we often end up applying and reinforcing the current system’s broken logic to social change. We end up recreating the same toxicity that got us here in the first place.

Under capitalism, we are trained to believe that everything can and should be quantified. We may even want to believe that we receive a little “impact” score that reveals something meaningful about us. But we don’t. And when we try to quantify things in this way, we fail to understand them in their full power and complexity.

Our world is impossibly mysterious. It is volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous. In such a world, we can never truly know the full effects of our actions. What might look small may ripple out in world-changing ways we can’t comprehend or see, even for decades after the fact. What seems huge and meaningful may vanish overnight or have massive, unintended, harmful consequences that undermine the change we seek.

Impact cannot be reduced to numbers or comparisons in the way we might want. The only thing we can actually consistently measure in this arena is something like social clout — likes, followers, recognition, status. But social clout has nothing to do with impact. And it has everything to do with winning some imaginary competition that validates our existence in some way.

Here’s the thing: Doing good in the world is NOT about being bigger, doing more, or proving ourselves. It’s not actually about you or me at all! Let me say that again: It’s not about you. It’s not about me. It’s about the world at large. It’s about aligning to that world from a place of integrity, compassion, and purpose.

So maybe the question is not: How do I have a bigger impact?

Maybe it’s something more like: Is my life’s work (at whatever scale) an expression of goodness? Am I in integrity? Am I in a genuine positive exchange with the world around me?

These are simple yes-or-no questions.  There’s no measurement. There’s no score. There’s no grade. There’s no award – other than just feeling good and knowing you’ve contributed something meaningful to a world in need.

If it feels good through and through, it’s almost certainly doing good in the world. And any amount of doing good is enough.

More articles


  • Kindness fiction

    Kindness fiction

    What does a tragic hero story look like when all players are motivated by love, collaboration, and kindness? Are heroes even necessary anymore?


  • Is life boring?

    Is life boring?

    What in your life is only acceptable when you numb yourself to it?


  • Anniversary

    Anniversary

    Friday marked my one-year anniversary as a leadership coach. It feels like I’ve learned an almost impossible amount about myself, this profession, and my role and style within it. And yet, it’s also shocking how fast it has all gone by.


  • Climate sacrifice

    Climate sacrifice

    Have you been a climate zombie? What sacrifice might you make to help maintain a livable planet?


  • A strong take

    A strong take

    When I really listen within, what feels most alive lately is an impulse to speak more powerfully and boldly, especially about ways I and others can be in greater integrity with ourselves, our society, and our planet.


Peter Schulte AI-generated headshot

I help aspiring changemakers do good in the world and feel good in the process.

1 thought on “The myth of bigger impact”

  1. Interesting thoughts on “scaling up”. The only quibble here is how do you define “goodness” and “positive exchange”? Instead perhaps, “am I contributing to the creation of regenerative capacity within larger living systems”? Am I in integrity with my own essence? Good/bad, positive/negative binaries are a significant part of the problem. The question is how do we reconcile, harmonize, and balance these supposed dualities while staying our of judgement?

Leave a Reply to Marcus Sheffer Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Great to Good posts


  • Antidotes to polycrisis despair

    Antidotes to polycrisis despair

    How can we be present to and intervene meaningfully in the polycrisis and the world’s greatest challenges without getting swept away by them?


  • Stop trying to save the world

    Stop trying to save the world

    You don't need to save the world. Simply tending to our own lives and making authentic human connections is usually the most impactful thing we…


  • Purpose is not improv. You have to say no.

    Purpose is not improv. You have to say no.

    If you lack purpose, don't go searching for it. Simply start removing all the non-essentials cluttering up your life until whatever is most essential reveals…